Do you agree or disagree that the distinction between legal drugs and illegal drugs is not logical?

I agree that the distinction between legal and illegal drugs can be seen as illogical, as it often relies on historical, cultural, and political factors rather than scientific evidence of harm or benefit. For instance, substances like alcohol and tobacco, which are legal, can have severe health consequences, while some illegal drugs may have therapeutic potential. This inconsistency raises questions about the criteria used to classify substances and suggests a need for a more evidence-based approach to drug policy.