How did the view of Calhoun and Webster differ?

John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster had fundamentally different views on the role of states versus the federal government. Calhoun championed states' rights and advocated for the idea of nullification, believing that states could reject Federal Laws they deemed unconstitutional. In contrast, Webster emphasized the importance of national unity and a strong federal government, arguing that the Constitution was designed to create a single nation rather than a loose confederation of states. Their debates highlighted the growing sectional tensions in the United States, particularly over issues like slavery and states' authority.