What was Bolivar's viewpoint towards the majority of Latin people?

Besides Mexico's Benito Juarez, who kinda did not have a choice because he was a full blooded native American himself, although in his time there were some racist-against-their-own-people natives, and Hondura's Morazan, Bolivar is only one among three Latin American "liberator" generals genuinely interested in the greater good of the people. See, the main reason most of the creoles, that is, the Spanish (read, European) blood, but latin American born upper classes wanted freedom from Spain was because they wanted power for themselves. Although the government of Spain was indeed abusive, most of that abuse was felt by the mestizo and native population, and with the creoles, they had a MORE than fair arrangement. What you need to understand is that while the Spanish crown took the bulk of the profits made at hacienda operations, haciendas were massive farms, some as big as 10,000 acres, the owners of the Haciendas got a tidy profit out of the deal.

Here was the arrangement; the hacienda "patron" (the big cheese), would give the Spanish crown most of his profits BUT, he got to keep ALL of his surplus and do what he wanted with it. The surplus generated in the farms of Latin America is often huge, so huge, that the Spanish crown got massive sums of money from the main crop yield, and the hacienda patrones got to sell the surplus also for a large sum. Like I said; it was a more than fair arrangement. Had they really wanted to the government of Spain could have simply taken it all.

See though, throughout the generations though the hacienda families got wealthier and wealthier, and as their power and political influence grew, greedier and greedier it got to the point where they no longer felt like sharing. Hence, the moment a charismatic leader popped up, said leader would be used and funded per their convenience. Morazan for example, was entirely too "upright and moral" for his own good, so the hacienda families of latin America conspired to have him executed, which they did; he was executed in Costa Rica via firing squad.

Benito Juarez was simply martyred; he was shot by Spanish soldiers when he declared Mexico's freedom, Mexico's most powerful people said to themselves "if there was a chance, that would be it....." They milked his death, no pun intended, to death; the fight against the Spaniards in Mexico was all "in the name of Benito." Most Americans only see the native, or predominantly native American Mexicans, unfortunately that society's lowest and mistreated class; they are not aware of the massively wealthy upper classes, who often get their education from places such as Oxford and Harvard.

In fact, many of Mexico's hacienda owners have degrees from those places. Where it up to me I'd burn that place to the ground, and everything it stands for. Oxford too, make no mistake. I'd probably spare places like M.I.T. and Edinburgh University though; Edinburgh, for their ultra hardcore commitment at having the best medical school in the world, and for being notorious for having admited medical students from all over the world, from every race, and all walks of life, to train them to be good doctors. I like M.I.T., because they still use the entrance exam system; believe it or not, if you have the grit and brain, it is a test you can actually study for.

M.I.T. believes, admission should be low based on how tough their entrance exam is, not the "selection" process. See Universities of the Oxford and Cambridge tradition "select" alright; based on legacy and birth.

In fact many Jewish people have connections to Europe's nobles; that is why they win so many nobel prizes, and get into those "big name" schools.

Ashkenazi Jews believe it or not, true to the Arab accusation ARE indeed colonialist tyrants, no different from Cortez.