Why might Leonard believe that democracy would inevitably degenerate into tumult violence and anarchy?

Leonard might believe that democracy could degenerate into tumult, violence, and anarchy due to the inherent conflicts of interest among diverse groups within society, leading to polarization and strife. The competition for power and resources can foster division and hostility, undermining social cohesion. Additionally, he may argue that the potential for populism and demagoguery in democratic systems can exploit these divisions, inciting chaos and undermining established norms and institutions. Thus, he sees democracy as vulnerable to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.