Can the fist world war be regarded as a particularly progressive conflict or did it derail the progressive movement?

The First World War can be seen as both a catalyst for progress and a derailment of the progressive movement. On one hand, it accelerated social changes, such as women's suffrage and labor rights, as women entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers and the war effort highlighted the need for social reforms. On the other hand, the war's devastation and the subsequent rise of totalitarian regimes in some countries hindered the progressive ideals of democracy and international cooperation, leading to a complex legacy of both advancement and setback. Ultimately, while it spurred certain progressive changes, the conflict also created conditions that undermined many of the movement's goals.