Transfer of title in the law relating to sale of goods is governed by alating maxim nemo dat quod non habet explain the rule and how it applies to innocent purchasers of both voidable and void titles?

The legal maxim "nemo dat quod non habet" translates to "no one gives what they do not have," establishing that a seller cannot transfer a better title than they possess. This rule means that if a seller has a void title, they cannot confer any rights to the buyer, making the transaction invalid. In the case of a voidable title, an innocent purchaser may acquire good title if they buy in good faith without knowledge of the seller's lack of authority, as the original owner's right to void the title does not affect the rights of subsequent bona fide purchasers. Thus, while void titles offer no protection to buyers, voidable titles can still provide valid rights to innocent purchasers.