Why is it not possible for a purely objective historian to exist in history?

A purely objective historian cannot exist because all historians are influenced by their own cultural backgrounds, personal beliefs, and societal contexts, which shape their interpretations of events. Additionally, the selection of which events to study, the sources chosen for analysis, and the narratives constructed are inherently subjective processes. Even the language used to describe historical events carries biases, making complete objectivity unattainable. Ultimately, history is a complex interplay of facts and interpretations, reflecting the historian's perspectives as much as the events themselves.