How did jules ferry's critics attack the morality of foreign expansion?

Jules Ferry's critics argued that foreign expansion was morally questionable, as it often involved the exploitation and subjugation of colonized peoples. They contended that Imperialism contradicted the principles of liberty and equality, promoting a narrative of racial superiority that justified domination. Critics highlighted the hypocrisy of spreading civilization while perpetrating violence and oppression, suggesting that true moral progress should be rooted in mutual respect rather than conquest. This opposition framed colonialism as a violation of ethical standards, undermining claims of benevolence associated with expansion.