What are the similarities between Marshall and Taney's judicial philosophies?

Both Chief Justices John Marshall and Roger B. Taney emphasized the importance of federal authority and the interpretation of the Constitution, albeit in different contexts. Marshall is known for establishing the principles of judicial review and promoting a strong federal government, while Taney's decisions often favored states' rights, notably in the Dred Scott case. Despite their differing conclusions, both justices shaped the judicial landscape by asserting the judiciary's role in interpreting constitutional issues. Ultimately, their philosophies reflect the evolving tensions between federal and state powers in American law.