Does judicial review compromise judicial neutrality?

Judicial review can potentially compromise judicial neutrality by placing judges in a position where they must interpret laws and constitutional provisions that may reflect their own values and beliefs. This power allows courts to invalidate legislative and executive actions, which can lead to perceptions of activism or bias. However, proponents argue that judicial review is essential for upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights, suggesting that it can be exercised in a neutral and objective manner when judges adhere to established legal principles. Ultimately, the impact on judicial neutrality depends on the judges' adherence to impartiality and the legal framework within which they operate.