How can you use this document to argue that Hammurabi code was not just?

The document can be used to argue that Hammurabi's Code was not just by highlighting its unequal application of justice across different social classes. For instance, the laws often prescribed harsher penalties for lower-status individuals while affording greater leniency to the elite. Additionally, the emphasis on retributive justice, such as "an eye for an eye," can be critiqued as perpetuating cycles of violence rather than promoting true fairness or rehabilitation. This suggests that the code institutionalized social inequalities rather than achieving equitable justice.