What cases did not have a role in evolving a standard for what was and was not obscene?

Cases that did not significantly influence the evolution of obscenity standards include Roth v. United States (1957), which established the "prurient interest" test, and Miller v. California (1973), which refined the definition of obscenity. However, earlier cases like Comstock Act prosecutions and Ginsberg v. New York (1968) shaped the legal landscape but did not set binding precedents. Additionally, cases with minimal judicial impact, such as Pope v. Illinois (1987), focused more on narrower issues, leaving broader obscenity standards less affected.