Was juror three pressured into changing his vote?

Juror Three was initially adamant about his vote of guilty, driven by his personal biases and emotions. However, as the deliberations progressed and the other jurors presented compelling arguments and evidence, he faced increasing pressure to reconsider his stance. Ultimately, it was the persuasive reasoning of Juror Eight and the collective discussions that led him to reassess his position, suggesting that while he wasn't overtly coerced, the group dynamics influenced his decision-making.