Examples of procedural programming language

JavaScript

1. ABC
2. Ada
3. Algol 60
4. Algol 68
5. APL
6. Arc
7. Assembly
8. Awk
9. BASIC
10. Batch
11. BCPL
12. Befunge
13. BETA
14. C
15. C++
16. C--
17. C# (pronounced C-sharp)
18. CHILL
19. Clipper
20. Cobol
21. CobolScript
22. Component Pascal
23. Cyclone
24. D
25. DATABUS
26. Euphoria
27. Forth
28. Fortran
29. Free Pascal
30. GNU Pascal
31. Icon
32. IDL
33. Jal
34. JavaScript
35. Jovial
36. Lagoona
37. Leda
38. Limbo
39. Lua
40. m4
41. Maple
42. Mathematica
43. MATLAB
44. Modula-2
45. Modula-3
46. Mumps
47. Oberon
48. Objective Caml (OCaml)
49. Occam
50. Oz-Mozart
51. Pascal
52. Perl
53. PHP
54. PL
55. PL/1
56. Pliant
57. PL/SQL
58. PostScript
59. PowerBuilder
60. Proteus
61. REBOL
62. Rexx
63. S-Lang
64. Small C
65. Snobol
66. Tcl-Tk
67. T3X
68. VBA
69. Visual Basic
70. Visual DialogScript
71. Yorick

Note: Some of these languages, such as PHP, Perl, Caml/OCaml, and IDL also support object oriented programming. Others on the list (C++, JavaScript, C# ) are primarily object-oriented languages which can also (though less commonly) be used to program procedurally.

Some are macro or scripting languages (Rexx, Awk, m4) which, while they do support some procedural concepts, aren't really procedural languages, but rather interpreted streams.

Also note that Assembly is NOT a high-level language, and generally is not considered a procedural language, as it doesn't have enough abstraction.

Finally, traditional COBOL is NOT a procedural language (in fact, one of the long-standing criticism of it is that it lacks any structured programming characteristics). Current-day COBOL has some ability to use procedural programming concepts, but, overall, should not be considered a real procedural language. SNOBOL is similar, in that the original version were certainly not procedural in nature, but modern versions are much more structured programming friendly (and can be considered a procedural language).