What are the advantages and disadvantages of strict constructionism?

Strict constructionism, which interprets the Constitution based solely on its text as understood at the time of its drafting, offers the advantage of promoting legal stability and predictability by adhering closely to the original intent of the framers. This approach can limit judicial activism, ensuring that changes to the law come from the legislative process rather than judicial interpretation. However, its disadvantages include the potential for rigidity, making it difficult to adapt to contemporary issues and societal changes. Additionally, it may overlook the broader principles and values that the Constitution aims to uphold, possibly leading to unjust outcomes in modern contexts.