Was a Roman historian notable among ancient historians because he presented the facts accurately?

Tacitus is often regarded as a notable Roman historian for his critical approach to historical writing, emphasizing accuracy and a moral perspective. He sought to present facts through careful analysis of sources, distinguishing himself from other historians who may have been more biased or less rigorous. His works, such as "Annals" and "Histories," provide valuable insights into the Roman Empire and its governance, reflecting a commitment to factual integrity. However, like all historians, his interpretations were influenced by his own context and biases.