Is every harm and benefit evaluated the same in a utilitarian framework?

In a utilitarian framework, harms and benefits are evaluated based on their consequences for overall happiness or utility. While the magnitude and context of harms and benefits can vary, the key principle is to consider their impact on the collective well-being. Thus, not every harm and benefit is treated equally in practice; they are assessed in terms of how they contribute to maximizing overall happiness or minimizing suffering. Ultimately, the aim is to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number.