How were mass killing in bosnia and in duarfur handle differently by global community?

The mass killings in Bosnia during the 1990s prompted a more robust international response, including NATO intervention and the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to prosecute war crimes. In contrast, the genocide in Darfur, which began in 2003, saw a slower and less decisive response from the global community, with limited intervention and a focus on humanitarian aid rather than military action. The geopolitical context, differing levels of media coverage, and the presence of strategic interests influenced the disparity in responses to these crises. Overall, the international community's engagement in Bosnia was more proactive compared to the largely reactive approach in Darfur.