How does utilitarianism justify the violation of human rights?

Utilitarianism can justify the violation of human rights by prioritizing the greatest good for the greatest number, which may lead to sacrificing individual rights for collective benefit. In scenariOS where infringing on certain rights yields a net increase in overall happiness or well-being, utilitarianism may endorse such actions. Critics argue that this approach can lead to moral dilemmas where minority rights are overlooked or trampled in pursuit of majority happiness, raising concerns about fairness and justice. Thus, while utilitarianism seeks to maximize overall utility, it can sometimes conflict with the protection of fundamental human rights.