If you were one of the judges during Rizal and trial would you find him guilty of the charge of sedition founding of illegal association and rebellion?

As a judge during Rizal's trial, I would find it challenging to convict him of sedition, the founding of an illegal association, and rebellion. Rizal's writings primarily advocated for peaceful reform rather than violent uprising, and he consistently promoted education and civic responsibility. His actions aimed to inspire reform within the colonial system rather than outright rebellion. Thus, a fair consideration of his intentions and the context of his work would lead me to question the legitimacy of the charges against him.