Is nurture more influential than nature?

Nurture is by definition an act or series of acts that foster growth or development. It implies the thing being nurtured is in existence. THis is important because in the definition of Nature, a thing is caused to be or to come into existence. Nature suggests DNA and many medical and psychological findings are traced to our DNA family, ethinic and geographical histories over time. I believe therefore Nature is more influential and that the question is best answered in relation to specifics, such as placing the question in a series of contexts including: is nurture more ifluential than nature as it relates to childhood behavior during various stages of development. In this context the question becomes more interesting as it relates to the influences upon the developing mind of a person. In that case I believe the answer would then be that nurture would be more influential. One person's humble opinion to this intriguing question.