In your opinion did Charles A Lindbergh kill his son?

Opinion

Bruno Hauptmann was executed for the crime, however, many believe that he was innocent. The DNA evidence that could have potentially been used today to find the real killer, disappeared courtesy of the Lindbergh family. There are a few people who are suspected to have killed the boy, Charles Lindbergh is one of them. There have been reports that he had a violent streak, and there are those who believe he did kill his son and tried to make it look like a kidnapping, and some believe that a fear of DNA proving that to be the case more than likely is what compelled the family to hide all DNA evidence. This doesn't demonize them, as they probably just want to let this lay to rest as most who were involved in the case at the time have now died. But it would be nice to know the truth, and it is a question in history that may always remain unanswered.

Opinion

Look at all the facts. There are some strange signs and sights. Kidnapping by its very nature is a crime that lends itself to faking. If Lindbergh did do something rash he knew he would probably never be charged, being such a popular hero. The possibility of some kind of direct (Charles) or indirect (family member or house staff) murder cannot be discarded. One important witness, a Viola Sharp or Sharpe, committed suicide during the lengthy trial.