How do haemon's views of government differ from Creon's?

Haemon believes in the importance of flexibility and the need for a ruler to listen to the people's opinions, valuing reasoned debate over strict adherence to laws. In contrast, Creon upholds a rigid, authoritarian stance, prioritizing the rule of law and state power over individual perspectives. This fundamental difference leads to a clash between Haemon's advocacy for compassion and understanding and Creon's unwavering commitment to order and authority. Ultimately, Haemon's views emphasize the necessity of adaptability in governance, while Creon represents a more dogmatic approach.