Why is Danforth's statement that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it ironic?

Danforth's statement is ironic because it presents a false dichotomy that ignores the complexity of individual beliefs and the possibility of dissent. By insisting that one must either support the court or be seen as an enemy, he undermines the very principles of justice and due process that the court is supposed to uphold. This black-and-white thinking reveals a lack of willingness to consider differing perspectives, ultimately reflecting the oppressive nature of the court's authority. Thus, it highlights the danger of absolutism in a judicial system that claims to seek truth and fairness.