In the 1993 the U.S Supreme Court decide that frye v. US precedent is an absolute prerequisite to the admissibility of scientific evidence?

In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. clarified the standard for admissibility of scientific evidence, moving away from the Frye v. United States precedent that required general acceptance in the scientific community. The Daubert ruling established that judges should serve as gatekeepers, assessing the relevance and reliability of scientific evidence based on factors such as testability, peer review, and error rates. Thus, while Frye's standard focused on consensus, Daubert introduced a more flexible, case-by-case evaluation approach.