Which part of President Barack Obama's remarks on the Buffett rule uses the logical fallacy of false dilemma?

First of all, we should note that the analysis of the speech that I am performing is not on the basis of any political merit of Obama's speech, but purely on the philosophical and logical merits of it. A false dilemma is when someone provides only two (or more) choices of how a situation could turn out when there may be many other choices that have not been seriously considered and could be viable alternatives.

The speech in general uses the false dilemma of you must either (1) raise taxes on the wealthy or (2) raise Medicare taxes and student loan interest rates to recoup the money. This is a false dilemma because there are many other solutions. If you want to increase revenue, you could instead tax corporations or industry more strongly, require greater property taxes, increase the estate tax, invest US government funds, or issue more bonds. Conversely, you could make the government smaller so the current tax influx would be sufficient to pay for what is budgeted. The lack of consideration for these alternatives is what makes Obama's argument a false dilemma.