What is the dissenting opinion of justice potter Stewart?

Justice Potter Stewart's dissenting opinion often emphasized the importance of protecting individual rights and the need for judicial restraint. In cases like Jacobellis v. Ohio, he famously stated that he couldn't define obscenity but knew it when he saw it, highlighting his nuanced view on free speech. Stewart championed a balanced approach, advocating for the protection of civil liberties while acknowledging the complexities of societal standards. His dissenting views often focused on the implications of majority rule on minority rights.