Before being named a person cannot have served in the military for the previous ten years?

The statement suggests that there is a requirement or restriction that individuals cannot be named (presumably to a specific position or title) if they have served in the military within the last ten years. This could imply a focus on civilian experience or a desire to maintain a separation between military and certain civilian roles. Such a policy might be aimed at ensuring that appointees have a particular perspective or expertise relevant to the position in question. However, without additional context, the rationale behind this rule remains unclear.