If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent what might be or she do?

If a Supreme Court justice were to argue using a precedent, they would reference a previous ruling that addresses similar legal questions or issues. This involves analyzing the facts, legal principles, and reasoning of the earlier case to support their argument or decision. The justice might highlight how the precedent aligns with the current case's circumstances, demonstrating its relevance and the need for consistency in the law. Ultimately, this approach reinforces the doctrine of stare decisis, which promotes stability and predictability in the legal system.