I would rather have a nano . I'd rather have a nano because its better and it doesn't have a hard drive like a touch does (if you drop an iPod touch there's a high risk of it braking). if you were to have a shuffle its too small and easyer to lose. i don't like the shuffle because it cant play videos and it doesn't even have a screen. Nanos are thin and you can do fun things with it and its not to big and bulky. but if you like an ipod for running i would get the shuffle because you can just clip it on to your clothing and makes things a lot easier then putting it in a case. if you like ipods with video and not that easy to break i would get the nano. they're fun just to have! if you want to be mr. flashy i would get the touch. also if your a YouTube fanatic. in conclusion id rather have the nano I would rather have a touch. I'd rather have an iPod touch because it has a flash drive and you can surf the internet and play many free games. With the iPod touch you can download many free third-party applications in the app store. And a refurbished one can cost a lot less. It has a nifty interface, and since it has a revised thinner outer covering, it can slide right into your pocket. It has a light sensor and an accelerometer. It has a big screen (its actually mostly screen) and you can touch your music. YOU CAN ACTUALLY FEEL YOUR MUSIC. And watch movies and YouTube videos. There are ENDLESS POSSIBLITIES to this contraption. So, in conclusion, the iPod touch is way better than a nano or a shuffle.
Copyright © 2026 eLLeNow.com All Rights Reserved.