What two different opinions does historians have about the sectarian nature of the boxers organization?

Historians have differing views on the sectarian nature of the Boxer organization. Some argue that the Boxers were primarily a nationalist movement driven by anti-foreign sentiment, emphasizing their broader appeal across various social classes and regions. Others contend that the group was deeply rooted in local sectarian affiliations, highlighting the significant influence of secret societies and their distinct religious practices. This debate reflects the complexity of the Boxers' motivations and the context of their actions during the late Qing dynasty.