Did Emperor Nero really burn Rome?

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.

There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.