How did Wilson foreign policy differ from that of the other great progressive president Theodore Roosevelt president was more effective in foreign policy and why?

Wilson's foreign policy, often termed "moral diplomacy," emphasized promoting democracy and moral principles over strategic interests, contrasting with Roosevelt's "big stick" diplomacy, which prioritized military strength and pragmatic engagement. Roosevelt's approach was more effective as it allowed for decisive actions, such as the construction of the Panama Canal and interventions in Latin America, which expanded U.S. influence. In contrast, Wilson's idealism often faced challenges, exemplified by his struggles to maintain neutrality during World War I and his inability to gain support for the League of Nations post-war. Ultimately, Roosevelt's assertive tactics yielded more tangible results in reshaping international relations.