"text-align:justify;line-height:20.799999237060547px;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
Full information maximum likelihood is almost universally
abbreviated FIML, and it is often pronounced like "fimmle" if
"fimmle" was an English Word. FIML is often the ideal tool to use
when your data contains missing values because FIML uses the raw
data as input and hence can use all the available information in
the data. This is opposed to other methods which use the observed
covariance matrix which necessarily contains less information than
the raw data. An observed covariance matrix contains less
information than the raw data because one data set will always
produce the same observed covariance matrix, but one covariance
matrix could be generated by many different raw data sets.
Mathematically, the mapping from a data set to a covariance matrix
is not one-to-one (i.e. the function is non-injective), but rather
many-to-one.
"text-align:justify;line-height:20.799999237060547px;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
Although there is a loss of information between a raw data set and
an observed covariance matrix, in structural equation modeling we
are often only modeling the observed covariance matrix and the
observed means. We want to adjust the model parameters to make the
observed covariance and means matrices as close as possible to the
model-implied covariance and means matrices. Therefore, we are
usually not concerned with the loss of information from raw data to
observed covariance matrix. However, when some raw data is missing,
the standard maximum likelihood method for determining how close
the observed covariance and means matrices are to the
model-expected covariance and means matrices fails to use all of
the information available in the raw data. This failure of maximum
likelihood (ML) estimation, as opposed to FIML, is due to ML
exploiting for the sake of computational efficiency some
mathematical properties of matrices that do not hold true in the
presence of missing data. The ML estimates are not wrong per se and
will converge to the FIML estimates, rather the ML estimates do not
use all the information available in the raw data to fit the
model.
"text-align:justify;line-height:20.799999237060547px;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
The intelligent handling of missing data is a primary reason to use
FIML over other estimation techniques. The method by which FIML
handles missing data involves filtering out missing values when
they are present, and using only the data that are not missing in a
given row.
Copyright © 2026 eLLeNow.com All Rights Reserved.