Textualism in statutory interpretation and originalism in interpreting the Constitution?

Textualism in statutory interpretation focuses on deriving meaning from the literal text of a law, emphasizing the Words' ordinary meaning at the time of enactment without considering extrinsic factors like legislative intent. Originalism, on the other hand, interprets the Constitution based on the understanding of its text at the time it was ratified, seeking to preserve the framers' original intent. Both approaches prioritize the text itself but differ in their application across statutes versus constitutional provisions, with textualism being more flexible in statutory contexts while originalism is more rigid due to the Constitution's foundational role. Together, they reflect a commitment to limiting judicial interpretation and maintaining fidelity to the law as written.