Would you consider the Boxer Protocol an unequal treaty?

Yes, the Boxer Protocol is often considered an unequal treaty because it imposed harsh penalties and concessions on China following the Boxer Rebellion of 1900. The agreement, signed under duress, required China to pay large indemnities, allow foreign troops to be stationed in Beijing, and grant various privileges to foreign powers. These terms reflected a significant imbalance of power, undermining China's sovereignty and demonstrating the dominance of foreign interests in the region.