What effect would you expect the 1964 supreme court case wesberry v. sanders to have on the likelihood of a group of small rural framers being heard in congress and why?

The 1964 Supreme Court case Wesberry v. Sanders established the principle of "one person, one vote," which required that congressional districts be roughly equal in population. This decision increased the likelihood that smaller or rural constituencies, like a group of small rural farmers, would have a more equitable representation in Congress. As population disparities were addressed, these groups gained a stronger voice in the legislative process, countering the historical dominance of more populous urban areas. Consequently, rural interests would have a better chance of being considered in congressional decision-making.