What is the potential flaw in using Pascal's Wager as a basis for belief in a higher power, known as the Pascal's Wager fallacy?

The potential flaw in using Pascal's Wager as a basis for belief in a higher power is that it assumes belief in a higher power is a safe bet with no downside, but it overlooks the possibility of other beliefs being true or the negative consequences of believing in a specific higher power. This is known as the Pascal's Wager fallacy.