How was President Bill Clinton handling of the crisis in bosnia different from his handling of the crisis in rwanda?

President Bill Clinton's handling of the crisis in Bosnia involved a more proactive military approach, including airstrikes and support for NATO interventions to address ethnic cleansing and human rights violations during the Bosnian War. In contrast, during the Rwandan Genocide, Clinton's administration faced criticism for its inaction and failure to intervene decisively despite clear signs of impending violence, largely due to a reluctance to engage militarily and the trauma of previous interventions. This disparity highlighted a significant difference in U.S. foreign policy responses to humanitarian crises based on geopolitical interests and public sentiment.