Would the Roman constitution be easier or more difficult to change than the US constitution?

The Roman constitution, characterized by a series of unwritten customs and traditions, allowed for more fluidity and adaptation over time, making it generally easier to change through political consensus and practice. In contrast, the U.S. Constitution has a formal amendment process that requires supermajority approval in Congress and ratification by the states, making it more challenging to amend. Therefore, while both systems have their complexities, the Roman constitution was typically more adaptable than the U.S. Constitution.