What evidence supports the view that the 1791 constitution was moderate rather than radical?

The 1791 constitution of France is often viewed as moderate rather than radical due to several key features. It established a constitutional monarchy, maintaining the king's authority alongside a legislative assembly, which reflected a compromise between traditional monarchy and revolutionary ideals. Additionally, it aimed to balance power among different branches of government without completely abolishing the monarchy, thus avoiding the more extreme measures that characterized later revolutionary phases. This moderate approach sought stability and gradual reform rather than a complete overhaul of the social and political order.