Was this lack of a permanent army a strength or weakness for the League?

The lack of a permanent army was a significant weakness for the League of Nations, as it limited the organization's ability to enforce its resolutions and maintain peace effectively. Without a standing military force, the League relied on the willingness of member states to contribute troops, which often resulted in inaction during crises. This vulnerability undermined the League's credibility and effectiveness, ultimately contributing to its failure to prevent conflicts in the 1930s.