Why does Knowles leave the issue of gene's intent in causing the fall ambiguous?

Knowles leaves the issue of the gene's intent in causing the fall ambiguous to emphasize the complexity of human behavior and the interplay between Biology and environment. By not providing a definitive answer, he invites readers to explore the nuances of genetic influence versus personal choice, fostering deeper reflection on the nature of morality and responsibility. This ambiguity reflects the broader theme of uncertainty in understanding human motivations and the consequences of actions. Ultimately, it encourages readers to grApple with the implications of genetic determinism without offering simplistic conclusions.