Why according to Justice Clark is it better for a criminal to go free than to convict the criminal with illegallly seized evidence?

Justice Clark argued that it is better for a criminal to go free than to convict someone based on illegally seized evidence because upholding constitutional rights and the rule of law is paramount. Allowing convictions based on such evidence undermines the integrity of the judicial system and sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to abuse of power by law enforcement. Protecting individual liberties is essential to maintaining public trust in the legal system and ensuring justice for all.