How are the four schools of thought in human rights differ?

The four schools of thought in human rights—natural rights, positivist, cultural relativist, and feminist—differ primarily in their foundations and interpretations. Natural rights theorists argue that human rights are inherent and universal, grounded in human nature and moral principles. Positivists contend that rights are established through laws and social agreements, varying by jurisdiction. Cultural relativists emphasize the importance of cultural context, suggesting that human rights are not universally applicable, while feminists critique traditional frameworks for often neglecting gender-specific issues and advocating for a more inclusive understanding of rights.