How did the views of John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster differ?

John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster had fundamentally opposing views on the role of federal government and states' rights. Calhoun advocated for states' rights and nullification, believing that states should have the power to reject Federal Laws they deemed unconstitutional, reflecting his support for Southern interests and slavery. In contrast, Webster championed a strong federal government and national unity, arguing that the Union should be preserved above all, which included opposing the expansion of slavery into new territories. Their differing ideologies represented the broader sectional tensions leading up to the Civil War.