Some scholars have suggested that it was positively immoral that the International Style so completely depoliticized the avant-garde designs of the 1920s In what ways might this criticism reflect con?

The criticism that the International Style depoliticized the avant-garde designs of the 1920s reflects concerns about the potential loss of social engagement and cultural critique in architecture. By prioritizing form over function and aesthetics over ideology, the International Style may have sidelined the revolutionary spirit and social aspirations that characterized earlier movements. This shift can be seen as a departure from addressing societal issues, thus raising questions about the ethical responsibilities of architects in shaping the built environment. Ultimately, the critique highlights the tension between artistic expression and social responsibility in architectural practice.