How have the methods used by early historians changed for more modern historians?

Early historians often relied heavily on oral traditions, religious texts, and anecdotal evidence, which led to a narrative-driven approach that often lacked critical analysis. In contrast, modern historians emphasize rigorous methodologies, including the use of primary sources, archaeological evidence, and interdisciplinary approaches that incorporate Social Sciences. They apply critical thinking and skepticism to assess the reliability of sources, leading to more nuanced and evidence-based interpretations of historical events. This shift reflects an overall move towards objectivity and a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities of history.