How was Nicholas II different from his ancerstors in the way he ruled?

Nicholas II, unlike many of his ancestors, adopted a more autocratic approach to governance, emphasizing the divine right of kings while resisting calls for reform. He was less adaptable to the changing political landscape, ignoring the growing demands for constitutional monarchy and political participation. His reliance on a rigid, conservative framework ultimately led to widespread discontent and unrest, contrasting with the more progressive tendencies seen in some of his forebears. Additionally, his inability to effectively manage crises, such as the Russo-Japanese War and the 1905 Revolution, marked a significant departure from the more pragmatic leadership styles of prior rulers.