What underlying assumptions about social problems can you identify in Arthur Laffers assertion that the solution rest less not more government and in victor kambers view that we set up regulatory?

Arthur Laffer's assertion that the solution to social problems lies in less government suggests an underlying assumption that government intervention often exacerbates issues rather than solving them, implying that free-market mechanisms are more effective. Conversely, Victor Kamber's view that we need to set up regulatory frameworks assumes that some level of government involvement is necessary to correct market failures and protect public interests. Together, these perspectives highlight a fundamental debate about the role of government in addressing social problems, with one side advocating for deregulation and the other for structured oversight.